Policy, Trade and Housing Events
Two documents that reprice the curve without a single rate changing.
advanced · 5 min read · 15 XP
Between meetings, two documents can move the dollar as much as a decision does: the minutes, which reveal how the argument actually went, and the dot plot, which is the committee putting numbers on where it thinks rates are going. Both are widely misread.
The Federal Reserve publishes the minutes of each FOMC meeting three weeks after it, at 2:00pm New York time. Other major banks publish equivalents — the ECB's "accounts", the Bank of England's minutes with its decision, the RBA's minutes two weeks after.
The minutes matter because a statement is a negotiated document that hides disagreement. The minutes show the range of views: how many participants favoured a different path, what conditions they said would change their mind, and what they were worried about.
Read them for conditionality. The valuable sentences are the ones that say what would have to happen for the committee to act. "Several participants noted that further progress on inflation would be needed before…" is a testable statement — you can watch the incoming data against it.
Read the counts. The Fed uses a deliberate vocabulary of quantity: a few, several, some, many, most, almost all. These are not casual. A shift from "several participants" to "many participants" between two sets of minutes is a real change in the balance of the committee.
Three weeks is a long time
Minutes describe a meeting that happened three weeks earlier. If major data has landed since — a hot CPI, a weak payrolls print — the minutes may describe a debate the committee has already moved past. Markets sometimes react hard to minutes that are stale, and those reactions frequently reverse. Always ask what has happened since the meeting.
Four times a year — March, June, September and December — the FOMC publishes its Summary of Economic Projections, which includes the chart universally known as the dot plot.
Each participant marks where they think the appropriate policy rate will be at the end of this year, the next two years, and in the longer run. Each dot is one participant.
How to read it properly:
What the dot plot is not
It is not a commitment, not a forecast of what will happen, and not a vote. Each dot is one person's view of what would be appropriate if the economy evolves as they expect. Participants who do not vote that year still submit dots. The committee has repeatedly delivered a path quite different from what the dots showed, and its own chairs have cautioned against treating it as a plan.
Trade the change in the dots as information about the committee's current thinking. Do not trade the dots as a schedule.
Both documents work through the same channel as everything else in this path: they change the expected rate path, which changes the rate differential, which moves the exchange rate. No transaction in the currency market is required for the price to move — repricing the path is enough.
| Event | Typical dollar effect |
|---|---|
| Minutes more hawkish than the statement implied | Strengthens |
| Minutes revealing broader support for cuts | Weakens |
| Median dot shifted up versus last SEP | Strengthens, often sharply |
| Median dot shifted down | Weakens |
| Longer-run (neutral) dot revised up | Strengthens, and is structurally significant |
That the committee is less united than the unchanged median implies. A tight cluster around two cuts and a wide scatter averaging two cuts are very different pieces of information: the second means the median is fragile and could shift substantially on a couple of data points. Practically, it raises the expected volatility of the next few releases, because there is more disagreement for the data to resolve. The median told you nothing had changed; the dispersion told you the opposite.
What to remember
FOMC minutes reveal the range of committee views and the conditions members said would change their minds, three weeks after the meeting — so they can be stale. The dot plot, published four times a year, is traded on the change in its median rather than its level, and the dispersion of the dots tells you how fragile that median is. Neither is a commitment; both move currencies purely by repricing the expected rate path.